Recent Blog Posts
This is the fifth and final installment in my Tucson Short Sales series. I would suggest reading part one (Tucson Short Sales – Part 1 – What are Short Sales?) part two (Tucson Short Sales – Part 2 – I’m Ready to Short Sale My Home.. What Are The Repercussions?) part three (Tucson Short Sales – Part 3 – How to Short Sale My Home) and part four (Tucson Short Sales – Part 4 – The Offer is in to the Bank) before reading this article.
Once your purchase package has been submitted to the bank it will typically pass through several levels before reaching someone who has the actual authority to make a decision on the offer.
Larger lenders have different negotiators at each level who each have a specific task. A bottom level negotiator will typically review a package for completeness and ensure that everything is signed as required. A mid-level negotiator will typically order an appraisal or BPO on the property to find current market value and then attach that to the file and pass it on. And a high level negotiator will take all of the information provided along with the valuation of the home and render a decision.
The same process applies for smaller banks but usually one negotiator handles all of the tasks listed above.
“How much will the bank accept?” is the question I am usually asked by potential clients.
You will usually hear that there is a magic formula that lenders use to decide whether or not a short sale offer is sufficient. And truthfully, there probably are. But there isn’t an industry standard that can be cited in this article that you can use to accurately gauge your chances of obtaining a short sale acceptance.
It is different for every lender and for every situation. I’ve had deals with the same lender (Bank of America) where they were willing to accept different percentage of payoffs for properties just months apart. By the time you read this article the standards will have probably changed again and they will continue to evolve for the next few years as we work our way out of this mess.
If you would like to search the Tucson MLS for Short Sale, Bank-Owned, or Foreclosure homes, search for Tucson Homes for Sale or contact me for a comprehensive list.
If you would like assistance in avoiding foreclosure feel free to contact me for a no-cost consultation.
After waking up this morning and having a cup of coffee I came across the following article in the LA Times while progressing through my daily news read:
I had eerie flashbacks to our own situation here in Marana back in 2006 after moving into my house because .. well.. the same thing happened!
Some background to catch you up:
http://www.michaelkrotchie.com/fema-revising-flood-plain-maps-in-pima-county/
http://www.michaelkrotchie.com/marana-floodplain-issue-closer-to-being-resolved/
I find it frustrating that FEMA proposes “revised” floodplain maps without first consulting with the areas involved. In most cases the town/city/county(s) end up coming out of pocket for a private study to be performed to find out if FEMA’s assessment really is valid.
Here in Marana, most of the areas placed in the new floodplain were removed, with only a small portion being re-classified into the floodplain.
Essentially what is happening is that FEMA is playing the “better safe than sorry” card and drawing new maps to be in “danger zones” and then placing the onus on homeowners or government officials to prove them wrong. Don’t get me wrong, no one wants to be unsafe, but no one wants to suffer from the effects of being in a floodplain if they don’t have to.
(Just a brief note if you didn’t read the above articles, for federally backed mortgages (almost all of them are), flood insurance is required if you are designated to be in a floodplain.)
|
ACTIVE LISTINGS |
SHORT SALES |
REO |
% DISTRESSED |
SOLD LISTINGS |
SHORT SALES |
REO |
% DISTRESSED |
| By County |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Maricopa County |
33,892 |
12,477 |
4,148 |
49.05% |
7,361 |
1,372 |
3,148 |
61.40% |
| Pima County |
7,874 |
1,584 |
785 |
30.09% |
1,092 |
106 |
348 |
41.58% |
| Pinal County |
4,042 |
1,703 |
611 |
57.25% |
892 |
155 |
433 |
65.92% |
|
| Phoenix Area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ahwatukee-Foothills |
651 |
240 |
53 |
45.01% |
111 |
25 |
30 |
49.55% |
| Anthem |
246 |
143 |
14 |
63.82% |
69 |
17 |
17 |
49.28% |
| Apache Junction |
459 |
124 |
70 |
42.27% |
80 |
7 |
43 |
62.50% |
| Avondale |
516 |
314 |
79 |
76.16% |
189 |
41 |
100 |
74.60% |
| Buckeye |
878 |
396 |
149 |
62.07% |
250 |
37 |
141 |
71.20% |
| Chandler |
1,640 |
745 |
194 |
57.26% |
402 |
99 |
130 |
56.97% |
| Carefree-Cave Creek |
606 |
133 |
37 |
28.05% |
56 |
8 |
19 |
48.21% |
| Fountain Hills |
596 |
101 |
50 |
25.34% |
50 |
5 |
17 |
44.00% |
| Gilbert |
1,782 |
965 |
163 |
63.30% |
430 |
122 |
130 |
58.60% |
| Glendale |
1,402 |
669 |
250 |
65.55% |
456 |
78 |
233 |
68.20% |
| Goodyear |
736 |
350 |
109 |
62.36% |
188 |
34 |
81 |
61.17% |
| Mesa |
3,235 |
1,188 |
430 |
50.02% |
804 |
156 |
320 |
59.20% |
| Paradise Valley |
515 |
56 |
22 |
15.15% |
33 |
4 |
8 |
36.36% |
| Peoria |
1,311 |
556 |
171 |
55.45% |
306 |
67 |
127 |
63.40% |
| Phoenix |
8,662 |
3,479 |
1,342 |
55.66% |
2,200 |
342 |
1,128 |
66.82% |
| Queen Creek |
1,189 |
724 |
118 |
70.82% |
374 |
82 |
145 |
60.70% |
| Scottsdale |
4,932 |
1,119 |
335 |
29.48% |
567 |
108 |
155 |
46.38% |
| Sun City |
1,458 |
111 |
78 |
12.96% |
183 |
9 |
30 |
21.31% |
| Sun City West |
566 |
25 |
17 |
7.42% |
72 |
4 |
7 |
15.28% |
| Surprise |
1,549 |
725 |
177 |
58.23% |
378 |
80 |
152 |
61.38% |
| Tempe |
894 |
244 |
115 |
40.16% |
164 |
26 |
47 |
44.51% |
|
| Tucson Area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Central Tucson |
976 |
120 |
107 |
23.26% |
140 |
8 |
34 |
30.00% |
| East Tucson |
501 |
110 |
50 |
31.94% |
78 |
6 |
22 |
35.90% |
| North Tucson |
771 |
62 |
24 |
11.15% |
78 |
5 |
17 |
28.21% |
| Northeast Tucson |
462 |
45 |
24 |
14.94% |
46 |
5 |
10 |
32.61% |
| Northwest Tucson |
2,043 |
385 |
148 |
26.09% |
273 |
27 |
67 |
34.43% |
| South Tucson |
533 |
220 |
110 |
61.91% |
116 |
14 |
67 |
69.83% |
| Southeast Tucson |
579 |
177 |
59 |
40.76% |
95 |
9 |
26 |
36.84% |
| Southwest Tucson |
623 |
193 |
111 |
48.80% |
99 |
12 |
43 |
55.56% |
| West Tucson |
437 |
75 |
56 |
29.98% |
64 |
7 |
26 |
51.56% |
| Extended Northwest |
152 |
20 |
19 |
25.66% |
17 |
1 |
7 |
47.06% |
| Extended South |
546 |
137 |
51 |
34.43% |
76 |
9 |
23 |
42.11% |
| Extended Southwest |
346 |
38 |
29 |
19.36% |
25 |
4 |
5 |
36.00% |
| Extended West |
74 |
13 |
8 |
28.38% |
2 |
0 |
1 |
50.00% |
| All Tucson |
6,155 |
1,256 |
655 |
31.05% |
898 |
79 |
296 |
41.76% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Prescott MLS |
2,496 |
276 |
258 |
21.39% |
223 |
22 |
78 |
44.84% |
| Lake Havasu MLS |
3,537 |
215 |
434 |
18.35% |
354 |
25 |
191 |
61.02% |
| Green Valley MLS |
918 |
45 |
25 |
7.63% |
51 |
3 |
5 |
15.69% |
| White Mountains MLS |
2,011 |
74 |
141 |
10.69% |
110 |
4 |
30 |
30.91% |
Information is taken from ARMLS, TARMLS, WARDEX, GV/SAH MLS, PAAR MLS & White Mntns MLS on 11/13/09 and includes All Residential Actives, all dwelling types. Solds are for the period 10/12/09 – 11/12/09. REOs are Foreclosures (Real Estate Owned)
Tagged:

1351 East Fort Lowell #E
Check out this cozy, perfectly located 3Br/3ba condo located in the heart of the city. Fabulous location near bus, shopping & UA. Pool view from master bedroom balcony or covered patio, HOA fees include roof, exterior paint, hazard insurance, landscaping, exterior pest control. Priced to sell!
$99,500
Google Maps Link
Tagged:
Zero-down programs are few and far between these days, but one stalwart just got an upgrade!
USDA Guaranteed Rural Development loans offer 100% financing with no monthly Private Mortgage Insurance. Seriously, did you hear me? I said NO monthly PMI.
Although income restrictions for this program are determined based on the number of people living in a household, these limits were loosened beginning April 20. Previously, the income limitations were based on the exact number of people living in the home. For example, the limit for two people was different from the limit for one person; the limit for three people was different from the limit for two people, etc.
As of April 20, however, the household income limitations are grouped into two categories: 1-4 Person Households and 5-8 Person Households. This is great news!
It means that higher income earners with fewer people in the household may be more likely to qualify.
In non high-cost counties, where 1-4 people reside in a home, the income limit will now be $70,750. In homes where 5-8 people reside, the limit is $93,400. While these figures serve as a guide, there are certain formulas to arrive at these numbers where people can earn more and still qualify.
Now just because you see the word “rural” in the program name, it doesn’t mean we’re talking farmland here. Rural generally is defined as areas that are not densely populated and have fewer neighborhoods – but you might be surprised at how many neighborhoods qualify. To check if a home you are interested in would qualify click the link below.
More buyers will have the ability to buy a home without a down payment. Also, when it comes to USDA Rural Housing loans, the seller can pay closing costs up to 6%. When you combine these benefits with the available tax credit of up to $8,000 for first time home buyers, helping more people get into the home of their dreams is suddenly a lot easier.
To learn more about how this program can help you sell more homes, and how people earning more than the limits listed above can qualify, give us a call. This is a great opportunity to increase your business and your share of the market.
Sincerely,
Anita Becker
Coldwell Banker Home Loans
(520) 730-0969
Next Page »